While initial rendering can be a useful data point, it doesn’t say enough about the quality of the processing engine. That first restriction narrowed our field of contenders significantly, and from there we considered the remaining apps according to the following characteristics:įeatures and processing quality: It’s all too common to see photo editors judged based on their initial rendering of a file rather than the potential results after processing. are fantastic at what they do, they are beyond the scope of this piece. We’re interested in tools that are designed to take you from initial import and culling all the way to final polish and export.Īs a result, while standalone editors like Adobe Photoshop, Affinity Photo, Pixelmator Pro, Skylum Luminar, etc. This all-in-one approach is appealing not only because it provides an integrated workflow, but because it allows you to manage your photo files with more organizational control than a simple file structure would. It’s important to note that this comparison is specific to photo editors that also provide Digital Asset Management (DAM) features. It’s jam-packed with training, ideas, and lessons that can literally transform your photography overnight. Transform your photos and edits from average to awesome with our in-depth, mobile photography course. Get Our Best Photography Tips & Workflows

Darktable vs lightroom 2016